loading

info@meetujewelry.com    +86-19924726359 / +86-13431083798

Christian Dior's Postwar Golden Age Comes to the ROM

The dramatic, waist-cinching, full-skirted fashions of Christian Dior's New Look debuted in the spring of 1947, signalling a postwar return to elegance and the revival of the Paris couture industry. It was seen as a celebration of luxury after a long period of hardship.

But it also marked an about-face for women, who were ceding their wartime jobs back to men. That meant trading in their factory coveralls for throwback 19th century corsetry and some very cumbersome clothing to return to keeping house. The New Look outfits demanded much of the wearer. Theywere heavy, restrictive of movement and breathand required an assistant or twoto get strapped into.Hardly liberating.

Marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the House, an exhibit, titled Christian Dior, opens at the ROM on Nov. 25 and runs through March 18. It spans the golden age of the iconic designer, the decade running from 1947 through 1957. The exhibit is sponsored by Holt Renfrew - the luxury department store was the first to bring the French couturier's work to Canada.

Tracing how those handcrafted wonders of the French couture ateliers affected transatlantic trade and women's lives right here in Toronto has been the focus of much of ROM curator Dr. Alexandra Palmer's body of scholarship.

Palmer, who is senior curator, Nora E. Vaughan fashion costume curatorship, has selected more than 100 objects, including 38 outfits from the ROM's permanent fashion and textile collection showcasing day looks, evening wear and ball gowns for grand occasions. There are also borrowed accessories and examples of the intricate embroideries used by the House of Dior in that period.

In the exhibit preparation process, the museum team reverse-engineered the incredibly complex patterns, weighed and measured and did detective work on the details of the actual pieces, which is how they illuminated their links to historical fashion. Many of these dresses were donated by Toronto and Montreal socialites, who wore these pieces here in Canada.

They also discovered how cumbersome these pieces actually were to wear. These dresses used, "a breathtaking amount of material," Palmer says. To make the skirt for the 1948"Isabelle" formal ballgown that is a highlight of the exhibit, Dior used two complete circles of material, some 13 metresof fabric, or to put it in perspective, enough to cover a couple of sofas.

This gleefulextravagancewas atthe heart of the New Look, she says. The show's notes, presented on ipadsinuser-friendlycontrast to theold-schoolformality of the items they describe,cite a quote from Dior himself dating to 1956: "The war was over... What did the weight of my sumptuous materials, my heavy velvets and brocades matter? When hearts were light, mere fabrics could not weigh the body down." The hem measured nearly 14 metres in circumference: that is a lot of hands (or petites mains in the parlance of the couture atelier) and a lot of sewing. The atelier worked with master embroiderers. (Work from three embroidery houses Dior employed over that first decade - two of which are long defunct - are represented in the show.) Plus custom shoes (some borrowed from the Bata Shoe Museum), accessories, jewelry and hats. The exhibit will highlight the extraordinary and nearly-lost craftsmanship of the artisans who "produced extraordinary ribbons, beads, sequins and embroideries that Dior incorporated into his dresses with the assistance of his imaginative pattern makers, tailors and seamstresses," Palmer says.

The Dior atelier had its own cabine or permanent crew of mannequins (a.k.a models), and each dress was fit onto and worn by a specific mannequin. Incidentally, most of the mannequins went by one name only, so they were actually the prototype for modern supermodels. Each dress in the exhibit has been traced back to the mannequin who wore it in the original show.

"Dior showed a complete look, the whole package," Palmer says. But the story of what the dresses became belongs to the owners. Before designer "vintage" became such an overheated market, socialites used to donate their finery to museums for proper preservation and study. "The window on that is closing," she says.

Postwar Christian Dior is a strong suit of the ROM archives, and examples in the show include a spectacular fall season 1957 cocktail dress named "Venezuela," which was a gift from Toronto philanthropist Carol Rapp. And the Estate of Molly Roebuck donated the Dior dress of then-12-year-old Elaine Roebuck, a silk organdy confection with cotton embroidery, worn to her Bat Mitzvah in Toronto in the spring of 1957. The young girl's dress shows the Dior style translated in more age-appropriate detail.

The question for Palmer is: "Why was Dior successful?" Yes, he had deep pocket investors in a time of economic boom. "But people still had to buy in," she says, and the return to more constricting styles after the freedoms of wartime dressing seem at first counterintuitive. But then, fashion is about reaction. "The '50s had to happen for the '60 to happen," she says.

Dior had "a very strong idea," she says, that resonated with how women wanted to look. "It is more than long skirt, cinched waist and rounded shoulders." Palmer has included a 19th-century gown in the exhibit to illuminate the kind of techniques Dior was reviving, including double bodices and corsetry. "But at the same time, the couture atelier was his research and development lab," she says, and you see ideas from earlier collections expanding through subsequent years.

A standout jewelry piece borrowed for the exhibit comes from renowned Toronto collector and costume jewelry dealer Carol Tannenbaum. "This was a period of optimism, wealth and growth, and the costume jewelry of Dior in that era had real grandeur. It was made in very small quantity with great awareness to detail and construction. The piece she has loaned is a lily of the valley necklace made of pearls with poured glassleaves.

"This is fantasy jewelry, and it is very rare. It was made by Dior's jewelry designer at the time, Roger Scemama." Tannenbaum found it at the Armoury art show in New York many years ago, "It just wowed me. I paid a fortune for it. It had to be mine. It has a beautiful long neckline, and it lays like a garment. There is nothing timid about it." Calling it "one of the great pieces I've seen in my career, in 35 years," she says she had not worn it since last spring to a Bar Mitzvah in New York. "The auction houses are having a field day with this period," and prices now are "forbidding," she says.

Fashion is an animate art, meant to be infused with social context, movement and the wearer's personality, so staticmuseum shows are always a challenge for curators to bring to life. This one is compelling because ofits local context: The fantasydresses seem somehow closer because they are part of our past, too.And despite its natural sex-appeal, fashion scholarship itselflagged behind other subjects for a long timebecause of traditional biases, says colleague Sarah Fee, a curator focusing on Eastern Hemisphere Textiles and Fashion.

Fashion and textiles have only recently become hot areas of study, Fee says. "In the '60s, '70s and '80s, textiles were disregarded because of male bias. But in the '90s, feminist anthropologists started to make the connection that cloth is central to identity, social life and religious life. Fashion got back on the radar, and has brought it back to such an extent that we can barely keep up." The ROM has some 55,000 items in its permanent textile collection, ranging from BCE to present, across the globe and across cultures. The historical archives have more relevance, today, says Fee, because fashion "is not just east to west, west to east, it is not a top-down only phenomenon. Street culture is happening across time and space." As popular interest in fashion grows, fashion exhibits have also become reliable turnstile churners for museums around the world. Anna Wintour's Met Ball has become the most exclusive invite in celebrity-land; the giant photo op anchors the fashion calendar and raises money for the Costume Institute at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City and launches an annual fashion exhibit. Paris is also currently hosting a 70th anniversary celebration of Dior at the Musee des Arts Decoratifs. Palmer herself is the author of a book for the Victoria & Albert museum in London called Dior: A New Look, A New Enterprise 1947 -57; the V & A has held many sellout fashion events, including Alexander McQueen, Jean Paul Gaultier and Missoni.

And rather than a catalogue of this new exhibition, Palmer will be producing another book, focusing on the ROM's Dior pieces set to launch early next year. Illustrated with photos shot by official Dior photographer Laziz Hamani, it will be called Christian Dior: History & Modernity,1947-1957, (ROM Press 2018) For info on lecture series and other programming related to the show, go to:

rom.on.ca/en/dior

Christian Dior's Postwar Golden Age Comes to the ROM 1

āļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļąāļšāļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļē
āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ
āļšāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļ
The Gilded Age
The unadorned room that serves as the entrance to V Vintage is the ultimate fake-out. Take a few steps into this second-floor office-turned-boutique, hang a right th...
āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ”āļīāļšāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļ„āļ·āļ­āļ­āļ°āđ„āļĢ?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ”āļīāļšāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļđāđ‰āļˆāļąāļāļāļąāļ™āđƒāļ™āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļĒāļ­āļ”āļ™āļīāļĒāļĄāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ“āļĩāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ‡āļ—āļ™ āļĄāļĩāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļ§āļ§āļ§āļēāļ§ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļ™āļ—āļēāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ­āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡
āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ„āļļāļ“āļŠāļĄāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ­āļ°āđ„āļĢāļšāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ”āļīāļšāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļ„āļļāļ“āļŠāļĄāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ”āļīāļšāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡ 925 āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāđƒāļ™āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļˆāļīāļ§āđ€āļ§āļĨāļĢāļĩāđˆ āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļ™āļ—āļēāļ™ āļĄāļĩāļĢāļđāļ›āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļĄāļąāļ™āļ§āļēāļ§ āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ­āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āđƒāļˆ
āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ S925 āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāđ„āļŦāļĢāđˆ?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ S925: āļ„āļđāđˆāļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļŠāļĄāļšāļđāļĢāļ“āđŒ


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļŦāļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ™āļŠāļ­āļšāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļ§āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļ§āļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ™āļēāļ™āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐ āđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļˆāļīāļ§āđ€āļ§āļĨāļĢāļĩāđˆāļāđ‡āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāđƒāļāļĨāđ‰āļŠāļīāļ”āļāļąāļšāļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļĨāđ‰āļģāļ„āđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĨāļ­āļ” āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āļīāļĒāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”
āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāđ„āļŦāļĢāđˆāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ• 925?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āđ€āļœāļĒāļĢāļēāļ„āļēāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđāļ—āđ‰ 925: āļ„āļđāđˆāļĄāļ·āļ­āļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™


āļšāļ—āļ™āļģ (50 āļ„āļģ):


āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ›āļąāļˆāļˆāļąāļĒāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļ–āļ·āļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ āļ­āļēāđ‚āļĄ
āļŠāļąāļ”āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ§āļĄāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļ„āļ·āļ­āļ­āļ°āđ„āļĢ?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļŠāļąāļ”āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ§āļĄāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:


āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļđāļ”āļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ–āļ·āļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ āđƒāļ™āļŦāļĄāļđāđˆ
āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ— āđƒāļ”āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļˆāļĩāļ™
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļ”āđ€āļ”āđˆāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĨāļīāļĻāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļˆāļĩāļ™


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļˆāļĩāļ™āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ•āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļāļĩāđˆāļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļĄāļē āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ›āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ āļ—āđˆāļēāļĄāļāļĨāļēāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĨāļēāļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒ
āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ•āļēāļĄāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āđƒāļ”āļšāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļž: āļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ•āļēāļĄāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļˆāļīāļ§āđ€āļ§āļĨāļĢāļĩāđˆāļ āļēāļ„āļ āļđāļĄāļīāđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļŠāļīāđ‰āļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ“āļĩāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļžāļŠāļđāļ‡āđāļāđˆāļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļē āđāļĨāļ°āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļāđ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĒāļāđ€āļ§āđ‰āļ™
āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āđƒāļ”āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡ 925 ?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļžāļšāļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļ™āļģāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ:
āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĨāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ‡āđˆāļēāļ‡āļēāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļŠāđ„āļ•āļĨāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļ—āļļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§ āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļœāļŠāļĄāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 92.5% āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡
āļĄāļĩāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925 āļĒāļĩāđˆāļŦāđ‰āļ­āđ„āļŦāļ™āļ”āļĩ ?
āļŦāļąāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­: āđāļšāļĢāļ™āļ”āđŒāļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļ™āļģāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡: āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĄāļŦāļąāļĻāļˆāļĢāļĢāļĒāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 925


āļāļēāļĢāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģ


āđāļŦāļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļĨāļīāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļŸāļŠāļąāđˆāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŦāļĢāļđāļŦāļĢāļēāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āđāļ•āđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĨāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļļāļ“āļ„āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđƒāļˆāļ­āļĩāļāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒ āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļŦāļē
āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ

āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ›āļĩ 2562 āļžāļšāļāļąāļšāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļš U āļāđˆāļ­āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ‚āļˆāļ§āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļˆāļĩāļ™āļāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļš āđ€āļĢāļēāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļēāļĒ


  info@meetujewelry.com

  +86-19924726359/+86-13431083798

  āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™ 13, West Tower of Gome Smart City, No. 33 Juxin Street, Haizhu District, āļāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ‚āļˆāļ§, āļˆāļĩāļ™

Customer service
detect